(30-12-2022, 02:10 AM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.A substitution cipher would have been deemed superior (if anyone ever had to choose, which I doubt) because it was secure enough at the time (without computers) and faster to use: with a little practice most symbols could be remembered and there was no need to glance at the key at every letter.(29-12-2022, 11:30 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But if was a superior way to encipher text then surely it would have been very popular. Clearly a cipher as difficult to break as the Voynich cipher would have been preferred to the standard ciphers of that time.(29-12-2022, 10:51 PM)Mark Knowles wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If it is simple enough to not need any historical precedent/influence and therefore in some sense outside of history then I would have thought it would have been invented multiple times in different places and historical periods.If it had a great practical value or if there was no other way to encipher texts it would have been.
There is an evolutionary gap between substitution ciphers and more advanced ciphers/codes that the Voynich fills nicely.

