I guess ciphers don't need to have been deciphered for us to spot their relevance. For example I'd agree that anything involving Roman numerals is automatically interesting. They might explain how there is a certain preferred order to Voynichese glyphs, but also other things like the way Voynichese favors word-final swoops (see here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ).
Anyway, I simply meant to explain what I believe to be the reason why many people are not interested in actively researching historical ciphers. But of course this makes the work of those who are looking into them all the more important.
Anyway, I simply meant to explain what I believe to be the reason why many people are not interested in actively researching historical ciphers. But of course this makes the work of those who are looking into them all the more important.