Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving?
#12
(27-12-2022, 06:36 PM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(27-12-2022, 10:20 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These two marks tend to align most with the pharmaceutical text (yellow crosses) [...]

Hi Rene,
unless I messed up something in the top plot You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., the bigram that makes f58 different from pharma is 'eo'. That bigram is typical of pharmacese, where it is three times more frequent than in f58 (~6% vs ~2%).

That is right, of course, and this bigram was not part of the first plots.
In the PCA diagram, the two pages end up near the edge of the pharma cloud.

It seems as if one of the reasons why the two pages are different is the frequency of "qo", but that is perhaps also not the full story.
[+] 2 users say Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving? - by ReneZ - 28-12-2022, 02:14 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Independent Analysis Identifying Languages Beyond Currier A/ B, compared to René Zand npcompl33t 18 2,442 12-10-2026, 04:10 PM
Last Post: npcompl33t
  "The Currier languages revisited" revisited kckluge 72 28,206 19-02-2026, 02:11 PM
Last Post: kckluge
  Extension to the Currier languages ReneZ 19 16,169 15-05-2024, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Juan_Sali
  Time to retire Currier languages? Emma May Smith 42 38,204 20-08-2021, 12:38 AM
Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com
  Implications of the continuity of Currier "languages" MarcoP 21 27,495 31-12-2018, 05:13 PM
Last Post: nickpelling
  Scribal hands and Currier languages Koen G 15 19,023 16-02-2017, 10:33 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)