10-10-2022, 11:28 PM
Yes, that pairing paradigm of yours came to my mind more than once whilst calculating all that stuff.
A pair of Pisces, a pair of Aries (can be male and female), a pair of Taurus (can be male and female), a pair of Gemini (male + female), and Libra are also a pair in itself. But they do not pair Lions or Scorpios (though they could). - Why? I doubt that pairing has some computational meaning here, although at times I wondered whether one should not count e.g. the two Gemini as two additional nymphs.
With this Zodiac, as opposed to other VMS charts which are even more enigmatic, we are perhaps most close to mapping it to the outside-world concepts. That's why I focus on the computational side which has good chances to be borrowed from elsewhere, although perhaps with some changes or novelties.
A pair of Pisces, a pair of Aries (can be male and female), a pair of Taurus (can be male and female), a pair of Gemini (male + female), and Libra are also a pair in itself. But they do not pair Lions or Scorpios (though they could). - Why? I doubt that pairing has some computational meaning here, although at times I wondered whether one should not count e.g. the two Gemini as two additional nymphs.
With this Zodiac, as opposed to other VMS charts which are even more enigmatic, we are perhaps most close to mapping it to the outside-world concepts. That's why I focus on the computational side which has good chances to be borrowed from elsewhere, although perhaps with some changes or novelties.