09-07-2022, 03:46 PM
I'll just write my contribution here, because it also has something to do with "q".
I brought it up a long time ago, but I never really explained it.
It comes from..." We learn Voynich"
4 against 4
or why EVA "q" may contain 2 possibilities.
If you take a closer look at the VM symbols, you will notice that sometimes they do not look exactly the same. I therefore refer to the symbols as 4 and q to make it a little easier.
The question is, is it just a variation in spelling, or is there an intention behind it?
If I assume that there are several authors involved, is it still possible that they all have the same spelling tolerance?
With rare exceptions, both are only found at the beginning of words. That is why we speak of prefixes in this connection.
But how does it look when I put prefixes opposite each other? Both can also stand alone.
Examples in the appendix.
Wouldn't it rather explain the frequency of the prefix in the text?
What does it look like when I look at this picture?
I would see it as a correction. This suggests that there are more, or why is he doing this?
Appendix
4 gegen 4 engl.pdf (Size: 124.44 KB / Downloads: 70)
QU-Beispiele.docx (Size: 16.24 KB / Downloads: 73)
EX-Beispiele.docx (Size: 19.54 KB / Downloads: 25)
I brought it up a long time ago, but I never really explained it.
It comes from..." We learn Voynich"
4 against 4
or why EVA "q" may contain 2 possibilities.
If you take a closer look at the VM symbols, you will notice that sometimes they do not look exactly the same. I therefore refer to the symbols as 4 and q to make it a little easier.
The question is, is it just a variation in spelling, or is there an intention behind it?
If I assume that there are several authors involved, is it still possible that they all have the same spelling tolerance?
With rare exceptions, both are only found at the beginning of words. That is why we speak of prefixes in this connection.
But how does it look when I put prefixes opposite each other? Both can also stand alone.
Examples in the appendix.
Wouldn't it rather explain the frequency of the prefix in the text?
What does it look like when I look at this picture?
I would see it as a correction. This suggests that there are more, or why is he doing this?
Appendix
4 gegen 4 engl.pdf (Size: 124.44 KB / Downloads: 70)
QU-Beispiele.docx (Size: 16.24 KB / Downloads: 73)
EX-Beispiele.docx (Size: 19.54 KB / Downloads: 25)