20-05-2022, 02:22 PM
Hm, that's quite interesting...
What intrigues me more than the entropy increase by substitution is the increase of h2 by removing spaces.
If I read the graph correctly thats a plus of over 20%, that's massive and much more than in any other document in the text file you shared on the previous page.
I think if we assume a highly verbose cipher we either must treat spaces as nulls to overcome the shortness of vords or alternatively they may separate syllabes / word parts.
Does your transformation destroy the peculiar vord structure with glyphs favoring the beginning / middle / end - or to put it differently - is there a significant difference between glyph combinations within the transformed vords and across spaces?
If we assume spaces are randomly inserted (with a minimum and maximum vord length), there should be no difference across these spaces. But I would assume even after transformation, such would remain, although weaker than in traditional parsings like EVA.
What intrigues me more than the entropy increase by substitution is the increase of h2 by removing spaces.
If I read the graph correctly thats a plus of over 20%, that's massive and much more than in any other document in the text file you shared on the previous page.
I think if we assume a highly verbose cipher we either must treat spaces as nulls to overcome the shortness of vords or alternatively they may separate syllabes / word parts.
Does your transformation destroy the peculiar vord structure with glyphs favoring the beginning / middle / end - or to put it differently - is there a significant difference between glyph combinations within the transformed vords and across spaces?
If we assume spaces are randomly inserted (with a minimum and maximum vord length), there should be no difference across these spaces. But I would assume even after transformation, such would remain, although weaker than in traditional parsings like EVA.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)