[Article] Demystifying the Voynich manuscript using computational linguistic techniques

[MarcoP]

I have been unable to download the paper. Do I miss something, or is it only downloadable by asking access to the Malta University?

The fact that scribes 2 and 3 are not easily distinguishable can also be seen in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..

I would also be curious to see if the existence of Pharmacese is mentioned in the paper: i.e. the fact that Pharma aka Small-Plants pages (yellow dots in the plots) are different from Herbal A, though Currier classifies both as language "A" and Lisa classifies both as Scribe 1. The most prominent feature of Pharmacese is the high frequency of EVA:eol. This fact has been known for years, but its implications are still unclear to me.