[Article] Demystifying the Voynich manuscript using computational linguistic techniques
#4
So, Scribe 1 wrote Currier A? And Scribes 2 and 3 wrote some other parts in Currier B, but 'they' are not in total agreement as to who is Scribe 2 or Scribe 3. No kidding.

If the 'ed' bigram is a prominent marker of distinction, and let's presume that it is, then the 'edy' trigram is surely the most frequent example of "ed*" where "*" is any VMs glyph. It's really not as much of a support as some other, more diverse trigram candidates would provide.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Demystifying the Voynich manuscript using computational linguistic techniques - by R. Sale - 29-04-2022, 05:58 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Article] A Hidden Markov Model for the Linguistic Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript Torsten 8 12,758 22-10-2019, 05:56 PM
Last Post: MarcoP

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: