21-04-2022, 09:33 PM
(21-04-2022, 08:08 PM)Ruby Novacna wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I hadn't too much time to make all the tests. I have one file of the whole text. To make tests of A and B languages I need to select them in the other place, for example on the voynich.nu. I just never made such tests, so I'm not ready to make them quickly. My main aim wasn't just making calculations. I show that the shares of many Voynich bigrams in the text are too high for normal languages. It is written in my post. And no changes make the statistics much better. Changes are made to show how much they influence on the statistics. It seems Koen already explained the same.(21-04-2022, 06:54 PM)Searcher wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I transliterated EVA to make almost full alphabet text.All the calculations of letter frequencies have already been done 20 or 30 years ago, I don't remember if the difference was made between A and B languages. Nick has spoken several times on his site about the need to treat them separately.
And I still don't understand why at this stage replace the EVA letters, since you don't know their true value anyway. Moreover, I didn't see q EVA in your alphabet
In my transliteration, q - null (by some reason). You may not pay attention to this nuance, as it also doesn't influence the whole picture.

