They commented that it is for "a volume of commentary for a facsimile of the manuscript", adding this link : You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I'm not sure I understand, isn't this the one that was published 5 years ago? Maybe they want to bring renewed interest to it with a new commentary?
I'm not sure I understand, isn't this the one that was published 5 years ago? Maybe they want to bring renewed interest to it with a new commentary?


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)