02-04-2022, 11:22 PM
[quote="tavie" pid='49753' dateline='1648914874']
Dear Tavie,
Widespread public and academic views on this subject are illogical and inconsistent. Yes, as you mentioned, it is possible for people to change their language and forget it. But the languages of civilizations such as the Sumerian and Etruscan have been able to partially transfer word residues up to this day by evolving. In this case, we cannot say that these languages have completely disappeared.
Some words of these languages survive in other languages today, having undergone partial phonetic changes. They live in languages with their modern relatives, with a greater number of inherited vocabulary.
Because of the structure of these languages, the root words are usually monosyllabic and they change their phonetic structure very little. In this way, about 2000 words from the Sumerian language live in Turkish. Only Linguist Arif Cengiz Erman matched about 1300 of them. These numbers have increased over time and will continue to increase as reading studies continue.
But there are minor errors made in the Sumerian alphabet transcription. I detected them. I can say that this number will increase in the future for sure.
A large number of words from the Etruscan language are also available in our language.
Many texts from the Etruscan civilization can still be read due to the Turkey Turkish vocabulary. To follow them at least you need to be aware of the content of the books and articles of the linguist "Prof. Dr. Firudin Celilov".
In other words, the information that "Sumerian language has not related/connected to any living language" is wrong and it will be corrected. There are many mistakes made by linguists, and these will become clear in time.
In other words, it is wrong to say that some of the old words in the languages of these ancient civilizations are completely dead today, even if they have undergone partial phonetic changes. So, they are partially living in the cognate languages.
We read and draw inferences from the articles of different scholars, and I personally study Etruscan texts and Sumerian texts that are said to have been read. I also know what is written on these subjects in the West. There is no point in repeating the Western view to me. Because I've already weighed the differing views on the scales and, by examining the evidence, I've taken the heavier one.
If I had trusted every piece of information that was put forward as Western linguistics, I would not have taken the step to do the key transcription for Voynich texts.
First, we will show real Voynich history and its Turkish language content. Then I will continue to write articles, about how history and linguistics have been deliberately or unintentionally distorted.
Thanks
Dear Tavie,
Widespread public and academic views on this subject are illogical and inconsistent. Yes, as you mentioned, it is possible for people to change their language and forget it. But the languages of civilizations such as the Sumerian and Etruscan have been able to partially transfer word residues up to this day by evolving. In this case, we cannot say that these languages have completely disappeared.
Some words of these languages survive in other languages today, having undergone partial phonetic changes. They live in languages with their modern relatives, with a greater number of inherited vocabulary.
Because of the structure of these languages, the root words are usually monosyllabic and they change their phonetic structure very little. In this way, about 2000 words from the Sumerian language live in Turkish. Only Linguist Arif Cengiz Erman matched about 1300 of them. These numbers have increased over time and will continue to increase as reading studies continue.
But there are minor errors made in the Sumerian alphabet transcription. I detected them. I can say that this number will increase in the future for sure.
A large number of words from the Etruscan language are also available in our language.
Many texts from the Etruscan civilization can still be read due to the Turkey Turkish vocabulary. To follow them at least you need to be aware of the content of the books and articles of the linguist "Prof. Dr. Firudin Celilov".
In other words, the information that "Sumerian language has not related/connected to any living language" is wrong and it will be corrected. There are many mistakes made by linguists, and these will become clear in time.
In other words, it is wrong to say that some of the old words in the languages of these ancient civilizations are completely dead today, even if they have undergone partial phonetic changes. So, they are partially living in the cognate languages.
We read and draw inferences from the articles of different scholars, and I personally study Etruscan texts and Sumerian texts that are said to have been read. I also know what is written on these subjects in the West. There is no point in repeating the Western view to me. Because I've already weighed the differing views on the scales and, by examining the evidence, I've taken the heavier one.
If I had trusted every piece of information that was put forward as Western linguistics, I would not have taken the step to do the key transcription for Voynich texts.
First, we will show real Voynich history and its Turkish language content. Then I will continue to write articles, about how history and linguistics have been deliberately or unintentionally distorted.
Thanks