Historical Context

[Ahmet Ardıç]

[You introduce everywehere new polemic themes that have nothing to do with the main theme of this thread, I suggest you to open new threads for them, otherwise there will be an incresing number of sub-debates.

Your behaviour is like a teacher that teaches a lesson to us, your classroom. This is not the case. We are not your students willingly to learn your lesson. We are here to point out the weaknesses of your theory. Your repeated argument that we dont undertand is a very poor one.

The use of your unproved theory on VM to debunk another theory on VM goes against scientific method.

Languages dissapear mainly by conquest and/or cultural assimilation of the speakers, not for phisical extinguish of their speakers.]



Dear Sali,

It may be possible to assimilate the language of local groups whose population is small and-or whose culture is not widespread and not dominant. 

However, it is not possible to assimilate all the members of deep-rooted civilizations that have lived in vast geographies for hundreds or thousands of years, established cities and migrated in all directions. 

In other words, this argument is also an illogical thought (for civilizations such as the Sumerian civilization and-or the Hittite civilization) that is thought to be scientific. 
Irrational predictions have no place in science.

But you are right about other things. This discussion is moving to a different dimension, and it was unnecessary.

Thanks for your comment