Historical Context

[cvetkakocj@rogers.com]

These are already familiar characters of the Latin alphabet. But for all three words, the ones you read with the same SV phonetic equivalent (syllable signs, according to us) are different from each other in terms of their linear structures/organizations based on their drawing style. 

Ahmet, 
I explained in my articles that the two SV glyphs are two different VM letter, used for three different sounds SV, CV, ZV, which are hard for a foreigner to differentiate. Just like Canadians cannot spell my name properly, if I say it, and even if I spell it, they make mistakes. I had seen my name spelled as Sueta, Kveta, Svita. In the VM, those sounds can be recognized from the text or from the picture, from the words before or after.  
The words containing those sounds (which in Latin and German were written with different characters) are associated with the words for holy, bless, advice, warning, light, flowers, bloom. The words originate from the Old Church Slavonic which was spoken by Slavs in the 10th century. The Glagolitic alphabet for those sounds was developed by St. Constantine, a missionary from Thessaloniki.  
As you observed, some characters in my translation alphabet are the same as in yours, but I am puzzled why you transcribed the VM 8-like character as S, since it was used in most European manuscript for the sound D. Was there any evidence in Turkic dictionaries for that.
The reason I am interested in this is that the words starting with eva d (your S) are among the most frequently used, and are often preceded with the prefix Eva-qo (your syllable DO, which I read as PO). The VM linguists have already determined (without knowing the language) that qo is a prefix. Out of 4917 words starting with EVA-qo, there are 203 words which I transcribe as POKAL, 104 words I read as POKAR, 249 words I read as POKEDY, 93 POKEY, 266 POKUDY, 90 POL. How do you explain these prefixes?