Historical Context

[ReneZ]

I'm not prepared to announce my contextual information here as I am preparing that for publication. What I am seeking is any information that would confirm or refute the idea that the text is Khazar language encoded (reversed). I realize there is no consensus on this but perhaps when my contextual information is made public, there could be consensus.

Such information does not exist either way (confirm / refute). You might want to read up on the numerous analyses that have been made of the text, including comparisons with many languages and language families from all over the world. The word structure of the MS text makes it incompatible with all of them (with the possible exception of the monosyllabic languages of the far East). Whatever 'encoding' would have been done to convert one of these languages into the Voynich MS text, would work equally well for all of them.

Furthermore, the question whether a hypothesis can be refuted or not is a very common one with respect to the Voynich MS, and it is not the right question. A proponent of any hypothesis should provide sufficient convincing evidence, and then it can be discussed.

I am curious whether you have a realistic prospect for publication.