(10-01-2022, 06:18 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.No I mean that EVA "iin" does not necessarily represent a sequence of two identical glyphs and a third, different one. These are choices made at some point, but many researchers don't understand that none of this is set in stone. So I basically agree with you that other options must be studied.
However, I don't know yet how we can decide which reading is the best one, so I cannot answer your question.
I would like to share the information I had found regarding the reading of minims in the manuscript Tractatum de Husite in which the Stična Codex was found. Since Stična codes is properly transcribed, I know the reading is correct. I colour-coded different letters. It is believed that the same author also wrote the Latin text, where the flourishes over last minim are turned upwards.
