10-01-2022, 04:39 PM
For my own research, I have decided to make my own transcription (also rewriting the whole MS, including drawings, by using my own Voynich font). After a few pages, I have noticed that some minims are kinda weird...
For me it looks like the following:
EVA- n ( n), might just be an EVA-i with a ligature- therefore making a word daiin not daiin, but transcribed to daw/v/... instead regarding the count of i's.
EVA- s ( s), might as well be just an EVA-e with a ligature or a way to write c'h without the h.
EVA- r ( r) , when following the stroke also looks to me like EVA-i with an apostrophe = I'
and,
EVA- c'h ( c'h ) is in almost every case I found written from right to left.
![[Image: Sn-mek-obrazovky-2022-01-10-v-15-52-29.png]](https://i.ibb.co/m4SX0pK/Sn-mek-obrazovky-2022-01-10-v-15-52-29.png)
What are you thoughts on this? Wouldn't using a wrong transcription harm the results of for example frequency analysis making it unreliable? How do you cope with these "symptoms"?
For me it looks like the following:
EVA- n ( n), might just be an EVA-i with a ligature- therefore making a word daiin not daiin, but transcribed to daw/v/... instead regarding the count of i's.
EVA- s ( s), might as well be just an EVA-e with a ligature or a way to write c'h without the h.
EVA- r ( r) , when following the stroke also looks to me like EVA-i with an apostrophe = I'
and,
EVA- c'h ( c'h ) is in almost every case I found written from right to left.
What are you thoughts on this? Wouldn't using a wrong transcription harm the results of for example frequency analysis making it unreliable? How do you cope with these "symptoms"?
