04-10-2021, 08:13 PM
(04-10-2021, 08:10 AM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.EDIT 2: Reading the comments for the first time here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Quote:Mark Knowles on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. said:
I should probably say that if one has a triglyph
$&#
Then one shouldn’t also have the biglyph
&#
And similarly not
#
Actually this is not a necessary condition for a deterministic ciphering and deciphering. Having $&# and $& and $ at the same time is also possible.
I appreciate you finding this old quote. You are technically correct that this is not a necessary condition for a deterministic ciphering and deciphering, which is probably why I didn't say it was. However the situation I have described risks leading to confusion. If ($&#) = ($&)(#) = ($)(&#) in 3 different readings then of course it may well be that only one of these fits the context.