Publishing negative research
#5
I absolutely should make my research questions clearer. In my mind, anybody who reads my posts has read all the previous ones and understands where I'm coming from. Even if I'm picking up strands of thought from four years ago. Which is, of course, nonsense.

(One thing I have learnt is that I should weight the figures used in line distributions. I'm well aware that the figures "sag" away from the first and last positions, simply because some lines aren't that long. Anybody reading the research casually might be tripped up by that, however.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Publishing negative research - by Emma May Smith - 01-08-2021, 09:09 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Koen G - 01-08-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Barbrey - 01-08-2021, 10:18 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by obelus - 02-08-2021, 12:14 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Emma May Smith - 02-08-2021, 12:30 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 02-08-2021, 12:41 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by nickpelling - 02-08-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 03-08-2021, 10:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Negative Reviews of the Voynich Manuscript rikforto 4 2,847 16-11-2025, 03:19 AM
Last Post: rikforto

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: