Publishing negative research
#2
Yeah! I couldn't agree more. I find the feeling frustrating though, when a question remains unresolved, especially after a lot of work.

One example where I experienced this was when I was trying to connect similar lobster images from various traditions. To quote from my conclusion: "Unfortunately my questions remain mostly unanswered."

I would like to add something even more important though: formulating a research question. My research which has been most useful and/or most appreciated usually has in common that I started from a concrete question.

The Voynich theorist tends to start from an answer and try to find support for it. But starting from a question is a first step towards protecting oneself from the tentacles of confirmation bias.

By no means I will claim that I always start from a research question, the VM makes this difficult. But when I do, the results tend to be clearer, even if they are negative.
[+] 3 users say Thank You to Koen G for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Publishing negative research - by Emma May Smith - 01-08-2021, 09:09 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Koen G - 01-08-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Barbrey - 01-08-2021, 10:18 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by obelus - 02-08-2021, 12:14 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 02-08-2021, 12:41 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by nickpelling - 02-08-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 03-08-2021, 10:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Negative Reviews of the Voynich Manuscript rikforto 4 2,852 16-11-2025, 03:19 AM
Last Post: rikforto

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: