Publishing negative research
#1
I'm proud to announce that the last two posts on my blog have, more or less, been failures. They prove no hypothesis nor advance our understanding. They even go against some of the things I believed or proposed, or at best leave those questions no nearer to an answer.

But publishing them is still important. Showing what we've done helps others by laying out our lines of reasoning, sharing our statistics and observations, and demonstrating that they don't really fit our hypotheses.

I encourage everybody to post their failures and be open when lines of enquiry run dead (or totally unproven).
[+] 8 users say Thank You to Emma May Smith for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Publishing negative research - by Emma May Smith - 01-08-2021, 09:09 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Koen G - 01-08-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by Barbrey - 01-08-2021, 10:18 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by obelus - 02-08-2021, 12:14 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 02-08-2021, 12:41 AM
RE: Publishing negative research - by nickpelling - 02-08-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Publishing negative research - by byatan - 03-08-2021, 10:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Negative Reviews of the Voynich Manuscript rikforto 4 2,852 16-11-2025, 03:19 AM
Last Post: rikforto

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: