22-07-2021, 10:14 PM
To the red colour. That is certainly an argument. I should examine more closely why it contains red. There is also the possibility that it is not a crown at all.
The chronology of the story of the crowns is important. It begins around 1365 and ends in 1440. It tells the story of all two or even three crowns.
That is the C14 dating. It only says when it was brought to parchment. If one were to assume that the person was already 30 years old, then the knowledge is also available before 1400, but up to about 1440 at the most.
The time and the environment and the education where the person grew up are also taken into account. Also takes into account several possible authors of the VM.
Different possibilities must be included.
The next step would be, what do the crowns have to do with the dovetails, and how does this reconcile with the 4 German sentences in the VM. And why the Romance spelling knows almost no double consonants right here. And would the Romansh spelling of 116 fit. Yes it does. All things fit together.
That is the small part of what the crowns tell us.
The chronology of the story of the crowns is important. It begins around 1365 and ends in 1440. It tells the story of all two or even three crowns.
That is the C14 dating. It only says when it was brought to parchment. If one were to assume that the person was already 30 years old, then the knowledge is also available before 1400, but up to about 1440 at the most.
The time and the environment and the education where the person grew up are also taken into account. Also takes into account several possible authors of the VM.
Different possibilities must be included.
The next step would be, what do the crowns have to do with the dovetails, and how does this reconcile with the 4 German sentences in the VM. And why the Romance spelling knows almost no double consonants right here. And would the Romansh spelling of 116 fit. Yes it does. All things fit together.
That is the small part of what the crowns tell us.