Thread for all discussion about "genuine/meaningless/fake" etc

[proto57]

It is in the end, a judgment call. Not every possible theory should be addressed, of course, but the stronger ones should not be ignored at the expense of the weaker ones, which is how I classify Rugg's.

As for Santacoluma's theory, I didn't remember it, so I found his blog and read the about page and I am still mystified as to what his theory is supposed to be. Not a promising avenue for a serious theory.

At any rate, the authors have promised on twitter to address T&S's theory in their next revision and I look forward to what they have to say.

Hi Mr. Carlson: The theory is outlined clearly on this page:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

That link is the top one on the list of links in the right column, under "The 1910 Voynich Theory".

All the best,
Rich.