Isn't there a conflict between the signs of the Zodiac in what might be something we would call astrology on the one hand, and named fixed stars on the other?
And if they were interested in named stars, why not include notable stars in other constellations, like the bull's red eye or one of the many others?
Here's what I think: Virgo often holds a flower. They put a star on the stalk instead. Similarly, pisces also includes a line, so they added stars there as well. No idea about Scorpio though.
And if they were interested in named stars, why not include notable stars in other constellations, like the bull's red eye or one of the many others?
Here's what I think: Virgo often holds a flower. They put a star on the stalk instead. Similarly, pisces also includes a line, so they added stars there as well. No idea about Scorpio though.