(10-02-2021, 01:34 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Natural languages are not constructed that way
At least the ones that do are a great minority.
I prefer to see "qo" as a unit that is in some way equivalent to "o" (i.e. word-initial o).
Then, there are many possibilities. It could be a modified version of this word-initial o or it could be something else that is not too closely related.
The very few cases where q is not at the start of a word, or that it is not followed by o can also be explained in several different ways.
All these open options depend on whether the text is rather based on a written original or a spoken original.
Just to give an example: if word-initial o is any vowel, then the preceding q could be a glottal stop or an aspiration (spoken original).


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)