01-02-2021, 08:44 PM
The easier solution seems to me to be that this illustration in MS germ. fol. 642 is not unique.
Others may exist, may have been digitised, but not yet found by this group.
Or it may exist, but was not (yet) digitised.
Or it may have been in one of many hundreds of thousands of manuscripts that once existed but simply have been lost.
Others may exist, may have been digitised, but not yet found by this group.
Or it may exist, but was not (yet) digitised.
Or it may have been in one of many hundreds of thousands of manuscripts that once existed but simply have been lost.