[split] Ms. germ. fol. 642

[R. Sale]

The specific data for each of the four C-14 samples is somewhat different. Of course the general inaccuracy of the test process renders those details somewhat moot. Still there was one example that had a test result that was centered on a date that was newer than the other three. Because of the inherent inaccuracy of the C-14 test, it is not possible to guarantee that all samples were produced at the same time. There could have been in one batch. There could have been two batches within a time period too close together for C-14 results to clearly distinguish, when there is a margin of error at plus or minus 30 years. It will just overlap in part with the other results. That makes the four sample average *possible, but not mandatory*. It cannot be determined either way by current information, but the two batch scenario still could be a factual possibility. And if one sample did come from a second batch of newer parchment production, then it cannot be validly averaged with the other three, and furthermore that would be the sample that sets the date for the final completion of VMs parchment production.