(19-10-2020, 06:16 AM)R. Sale wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yes, it's a legend. Of course, it's a legend. But it doesn't matter that it's not factual; it depends on what people of the given era accepted as being factual. Many 'legends' were given credence in those earlier times and as investigators we must accept that those legends possess a provisional validity even though we know the facts are contradictory.
Sure. It's the "1376 to 1469" part that seems off. 12th - 19th century would be correct.