If you made the VMs, ...

[R. Sale]

JKP,

Sure, as usual, there are always 'what ifs' and fuzzy maybes in trying to interpret the VMs. Absolute certainty is virtually unattainable. It is what it is. Nevertheless the examples can be quite clear in the way they are drawn. There is a regular series of rounded, bulbous projections and indentations along the edge of the various leaves, which real plants do not do. And as such there apparently are no botanical examples. Not to mention matching to other plant characteristics from the same VMs representation.


RobGea,

See f35v, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. has some good parts, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is a beauty.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. has triple headed bulbous projections on the outside. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is a multiheaded version and would make an excellent scallop-shell patterned cloud band, if it wasn't painted green.

There are also nebuly lines as roots in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and in lower parts of the main foot of f18v.

Is any of this actually represented in nature?

Have you gone through the "Wolkenband" discussion threads?