[split] Verbose cipher?

[geoffreycaveney]

I found it interesting that you had turned it into a readable format, but I do not endorse using this as the basis for a theory in the way that you might. If I had decided to add two or three more or fewer transformations, your result would have looked completely different. Moreover, this distracts from the actual problems of statistics we are still facing with the VM.

I haven't proposed a complete theory based on my VCI reading of the ms text, so I certainly couldn't expect anyone to endorse any such theory. I do think that ideas such as [o+glyph] = voiced counterpart of voiceless [glyph] phoneme may potentially be pointing in the right direction. This is just an idea inspired by your analysis, that is all, nothing more.