Ladies with Rings

[MarcoP]

Okay, very positive stuff!

Since sarcasm is against the forum's rules, I interpret this literally.
I am glad you found our replies useful!

Back to the subject, i think it is strange there are different angles on the "ladies with the rings". 

I did not expect all these different meanings either!
I think it's great to find out how rich the symbolic possibilities of ancient images are! It's a never-ending learning path.

This is a very distinct detail with an almost exact match of two items in the VMS, found on 1 page in another vms from 1410.
I hoped other people would browse through the Harley and would make the remark that there are more "hits" than these two, because there are, and 
what are the odds?

It's difficult to accurately evaluate the odds. If one looks carefully, the Voynich manuscript contains many hundreds of details and the are thousands of  illustrated medieval manuscript available online. Finding two details in a single manuscript is rare, but maybe not as much as one might think.
Personally, I find structure more interesting than details. For instance, structure clearly suggests that the Voynich zodiac is a zodiac (illustrating either a calendar or some astrological-astronomical concept).
The structure of the f85r2 diagram is also certainly meaningful.

If such a distinct detail as a ring provides so many angles, and we can not come to an understanding to what it represents,
i think it will be impossible to expect that we can find common ground on other pictures with much more different details and colours such as the herbal pages.

It depends on what you mean by "common ground". If you mean "universal agreement", I consider that both impossible and undesirable.

And if that is the general conclusion, it would be better to focus on that problem, because we could really make progress if there is a concensus.

Why so? Anyone can make all the progress in the world without any consensus.