On purpose

[Mark Knowles]

The simplest solution to the voynich - taking into account all the current most popular hypothesis - is that it a mid 15th century book of notes, written by several different people under one guidance (I have my own ideas about why this would be). Why the script? Again, several different ideas, but not relevant here.
So, fun? No. This concept as outlined above is outside the mindset of the era. It is also a hypothesis that does not obey Occam's razor.

I have mentioned a few times in this thread why and that I have not used the word "fun". Where is the evidence that doing such a thing for intellectual pleasure is outside the mindset of the era? I have provided contemporary quotes which seem consistent with that mindset. Why do you think it doesn't obey Occam's razor?