Categorizing the text-only pages

[RobGea]

Firstly to address this point:

I think it isn't possible to draw conclusions about the original order of leaves or composition of quires, because so many leaves are missing. We have no idea what kind of leaves ff. 59-64 were, for example, or which scribe wrote them.

This is a solid point and hard to argue with.

We will therefore proceed conjecturally,
This little project/experiment has some overlap with the composition of quires
but it's mostly about taking what folios there are and trying to see if there are any relationships between topics/categories,
of course to do this one has to define what a category consists of and by changing the defiinition , the relationships also change
but i just wanted to try it and see, does anything obvious pop out?, how strong are the realtionships, if any?
Will it be useful or useless, is it a valid or invalid concept, i have no idea.

Thanks everybody, lots of food for thought.
There were things i had overlooked , missed or hadn't even considered;

the visual,logical  -bi3mw, DONJCH; rosette cloud and the angled 4 people.

the physical, -Linda, LisaFaginDavis; the missing folios f58v-f65r, i hadn't even noticed that.

the statistical, -MarcoP's 'measure of quality' and page similarity measures.

In summary :
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. as the intro and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. as part of Balneological seem uncontroversial.
Quire14 as a category on its own, some statistical and logical support for this.
f57v, f58r, f58v, f66r,  remain tricky to classify there's 2 options either leave them out or clump them together in their own unit.