[split] Implications of multiple scribes
#47
Has it been remarked before that the Herbal A near the Pharma in the manuscript are similar to Pharma in textual characteristics? Their being bound apart from the other Herbal A folios is maybe not a mistake? But then f93 seems to be quite normal.

Were the final Herbal A folios written at a different time from the main body, and at the same time as the Pharma? Did they figure out something was missing by the time they got to that section?
[+] 2 users say Thank You to Emma May Smith for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Implications of multiple scribes - by Emma May Smith - 19-05-2020, 09:21 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by Anton - 08-05-2020, 08:42 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by DONJCH - 09-05-2020, 09:15 AM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by -JKP- - 09-05-2020, 09:37 AM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by RobGea - 09-05-2020, 02:07 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by Ben Trovato - 09-05-2020, 05:08 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by Anton - 09-05-2020, 05:17 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by -JKP- - 09-05-2020, 05:23 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by Koen G - 09-05-2020, 05:30 PM
RE: Voynich Paleography article - by Anton - 09-05-2020, 05:31 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why do we think the Voynich manuscript has multiple scribes? Torsten 33 23,170 01-10-2025, 08:38 AM
Last Post: Koen G

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)