[split] Implications of multiple scribes

[ReneZ]

This is very interesting Marco, and extremely informative. A lot of information to digest.

First of all, I regret that I have not yet updated the IVTFF transliteration files with the information of Lisa's hands. I have everything prepared, but just not yet done it.
This would have saved a little bit of work for this exercise.

I appreciate that you have largely used the same colours as I did, because that makes it easy (at least for me) to interpret the figures. I too am intrigued by folio 58 (r and v). Following the criterium of presence of the bigram ed (ED in Cuva), this folio is clearly Currier language A.
From the various plots, it 'language' is closest to that of the Pharma pages.
A good test for this would be to check the occurrence of eo on one of the two scales.

On the biological (Q13) and stars (Q20) pages it is interesting to see how the two folios of the same bifolio are related to each other. For example, in your figure 1, the two 'detached' pink circles 79 and 80 are together on one bifolio.

The biggest 'problem' in this type of analysis is that there are too many different graphs that one could make.