13-05-2020, 12:56 PM
(13-05-2020, 10:14 AM)Searcher wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On my view, the VMs contains pages with astrological context, but not f67v2.
I see it in different light. I think there are no "astrological" vs "non-astrological" pages in the VMS. Rather, all pages and topics are imbued with astrology, have some reference or connection to celestial bodies.
(13-05-2020, 10:14 AM)Searcher wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Anton, I couldn't understand what you mean under the "rulers of the water", because it is not correct. All the planets are the rulers of a certain Sign of the Zodiac and the rulers of Triplicities (in elemental divizion of the Zodiac). It doesn't mean that Venus or Mars rule over the water or over the tides, they are rulers of the water Signs (Scorpio, Cancer, Pisces). Obviously, f67v2 must contain, at least, one of those signs to make any sense. As for me, I don't see any evidence that f67v2 contains something that relates to the water zodiacal signs and their ruler.
I'm no expert in astrology, it was never my professional field nor hobby. I just refer to what's written in Wikipedia, where Triplicities are closely associated with Elements, in fact these notions are almost used interchangeably there. Maybe it's technically correct to say that Planets are Rulers of Triplicities (not of the Elements), but since Triplicities are Zodiacal signs grouped under Elements, this gives quite tense association of Elements with Planets.
Wikipedia contains many errors, so this of course might be just erroneous representation. Maybe someone can consult Ptolemy directly and report what's the real case.

