07-05-2020, 04:12 PM
(07-05-2020, 03:17 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(07-05-2020, 12:23 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Also, something went wrong with the x-axis of figure 3...we ended up with multiple EVA-[f]s there, I'm not sure why.
Two EVA-[f]s and two EVA-[p]s are not unreasonable. You use v101 by Glen Gaston to transliterate the text. v101 distinguishes between [f] and [u] and in same way between [g] and [j].
The glyphs in the Voynich manuscript occur in a wide variety of shapes. For EVA-[f] and EVA-[p] it is possible to distinguish a variant using a downwardly angled tick and a variant using a straight final quill stroke:
EVA-[fchs]
EVA-[chefalas]
Both examples are from folio You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
But that wasn't my intent with that graph. [f] and [p] weren't supposed to be duplicated in the graph.