....(baffled to see all these "investigations" going on here, all exactly the same as i performed years ago, with the exact same results ...)
You will see that using versions on transcriptions, will prove to be useful for one and useless for the other because transcriptions are still subjective, although I suspect that many of you disagree. That is also because the amount of errors made by the scribe (in using the wrong letters on that position) are approx. 1% of the total. These so called errors are not clearly visible but can be seen on statistical levels, as well as based on grammatical composition. Here on the forum they are often presented as exceptions or anomalies and used as argument why a certain theory does not hold, and that is the exact opposite of how I see it.
In my experience it is the utmost best, to use the same file, over and over again. Even if the transcript contains some errors, later on.
Any changes in between, must be downwards compatible otherwise comparisons with older investigations and analysis have become useless or less significant at least,
but it of course depends also a little bit on what you investigate.
It is also possible to change the transcription text such a way, that you receive the results you are looking for. That is often done in publications regarding the Voynich.
You will see that using versions on transcriptions, will prove to be useful for one and useless for the other because transcriptions are still subjective, although I suspect that many of you disagree. That is also because the amount of errors made by the scribe (in using the wrong letters on that position) are approx. 1% of the total. These so called errors are not clearly visible but can be seen on statistical levels, as well as based on grammatical composition. Here on the forum they are often presented as exceptions or anomalies and used as argument why a certain theory does not hold, and that is the exact opposite of how I see it.
In my experience it is the utmost best, to use the same file, over and over again. Even if the transcript contains some errors, later on.
Any changes in between, must be downwards compatible otherwise comparisons with older investigations and analysis have become useless or less significant at least,
but it of course depends also a little bit on what you investigate.
It is also possible to change the transcription text such a way, that you receive the results you are looking for. That is often done in publications regarding the Voynich.