26-04-2020, 08:43 AM
Coming back to the opening post:
Both the close correspondence, and the various differences with the core-mantle-crust paradigm were already pointed out.
My thoughts are about three groups:
[q] + [o/a/y]
These really occur in very preferential combinations, where the second group is unlikely to be 'empty' if the first group is not. If the right group does not have [o], the left group is likely to be 'empty'
[o/a/y] + [n/in/iin/iiin/m/im/etc.]
A similar thought here. If the left group is empty, the right group is also very likely to be empty.
If the left group has [y], the right group is likely to be empty.
[r/l] + [d/s]
This is really interesting. The ordering is preferential, but not a hard rule.
[r] on the left 'looks like' [s] on the right, while [l] on the left 'looks like [d] on the right.
[r] + [s] is much less likely to occur than the other three.
Why all this would be is intriguing.
(19-04-2020, 12:07 AM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[q] + [o/a/y] + [k/t/p/f] + [ch/che/chee/Sh/ee/etc.] + [o/a/y] + [r/l] + [d/s] + [o/a/y] + [n/in/iin/iiin/m/im/etc.]
Both the close correspondence, and the various differences with the core-mantle-crust paradigm were already pointed out.
My thoughts are about three groups:
[q] + [o/a/y]
These really occur in very preferential combinations, where the second group is unlikely to be 'empty' if the first group is not. If the right group does not have [o], the left group is likely to be 'empty'
[o/a/y] + [n/in/iin/iiin/m/im/etc.]
A similar thought here. If the left group is empty, the right group is also very likely to be empty.
If the left group has [y], the right group is likely to be empty.
[r/l] + [d/s]
This is really interesting. The ordering is preferential, but not a hard rule.
[r] on the left 'looks like' [s] on the right, while [l] on the left 'looks like [d] on the right.
[r] + [s] is much less likely to occur than the other three.
Why all this would be is intriguing.