[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research
#24
With respect to quoting earlier work, if one is knowingly basing one's work on previous work by other people, the only correct thing to do is to state this and/or quote it, of course.

If one is writing about a topic that was previously discussed by someone else, one may or may not mention this other work, depending on its relevance. General courtesy is never a bad idea.

However, it is better to quote no source than to give an incorrect or inappropriate one.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - by ReneZ - 10-04-2020, 06:33 AM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:09 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 12:13 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:41 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by Koen G - 07-04-2020, 12:46 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 01:52 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by RenegadeHealer - 07-04-2020, 02:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Not knowing", or changing one's mind. ReneZ 12 15,811 22-02-2017, 09:44 PM
Last Post: R. Sale

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)