[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research
#14
When I first joined those other guys <the VMs-list>, it was like red meat for sharks. "Oh, look! Another VMs-solution Loonie. Shall we spit out the bones?"

The Ninja's, by and large, have been far more civil, despite the occasional dust-up, now and then. 

The relevance of history depends the combination of investigative history with investigative interests.  In any investigation of the VMs cosmos, it certainly is more relevant to go with the Oresme comparison, than to accept some earlier Andromeda hypothesis that Newbold cooked up to support WMV's 'Roger Bacon' hypothesis. That sort of history tends to show how much progress has been made.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - by R. Sale - 08-04-2020, 01:47 AM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:09 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 12:13 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:41 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by Koen G - 07-04-2020, 12:46 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 01:52 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by RenegadeHealer - 07-04-2020, 02:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Not knowing", or changing one's mind. ReneZ 12 15,803 22-02-2017, 09:44 PM
Last Post: R. Sale

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: