[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research
#12
(07-04-2020, 11:30 AM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Marco's image reminds me of Brian Cham's curve-line system. I'm not entirely on board with his system per se, but the underlying observations are valuable.

I too often forget where I first saw things. I checked Rene's site and the concepts illustrated in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. were nicely discussed by You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (paragraph title: The Nature of the Symbols). In particular, he points out the several glyphs based on c and i and the fact that a can be seen as c + i.
Also, his conclusion is a sober "it doesn’t mean anything, but it’s interesting".
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - by MarcoP - 07-04-2020, 08:13 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:09 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 12:13 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:41 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by Koen G - 07-04-2020, 12:46 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 01:52 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by RenegadeHealer - 07-04-2020, 02:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Not knowing", or changing one's mind. ReneZ 12 15,803 22-02-2017, 09:44 PM
Last Post: R. Sale

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: