[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research
#10
I have no fundamental problem with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but its wording is a little bit suggestive of things that may not be there. Let me pick out a few phrases.

Quote:There's a strange sort of tension in this community around the issue of references and credit for ideas.

Unfortunately, that is true.

Quote:It's a bit of an article of faith in the VMS community that there are no new ideas

I hope not... I see new ideas eing presented here all the time. But yes, many people see things that other people have seen before. That is entirely to be expected.


Quote:Fairly frequently I see it happen that someone presents an idea or an observation in their own words and without references, and someone will reply pointing out that this idea is not original,...

Yes...

Quote:and that credit is due to the originator of the idea

No!!
Why?
For me, that second bit is part of the tension that was mentioned at the top, and it is not at all necessary.

Lots deleted....

Quote:This kind of culture of seniority is not necessarily what newcomers are expecting here.

???
Sounds to me like going a bit overboard here. Wink
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 03:52 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:09 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 12:13 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by -JKP- - 07-04-2020, 12:41 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by Koen G - 07-04-2020, 12:46 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by ReneZ - 07-04-2020, 01:52 PM
RE: Is [a] always [a]? - by RenegadeHealer - 07-04-2020, 02:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "Not knowing", or changing one's mind. ReneZ 12 15,803 22-02-2017, 09:44 PM
Last Post: R. Sale

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)