[split] Rich SantaColoma's comments to Lisa Fagin Davis
#12
       

To bring it to a better understanding.
The blurred signature and wormholes.
The blurring is clearly visible, so are the traces of the worm before the blurring ( brown ) and after the blurring ( blue ). New traces of the worm's feeding are a little bit brighter, because the wiping water has not penetrated so deeply into the parchment.
Now it is like this, with today's cover the worm would not have a chance after opening the book.
But if Rene's hint is correct, and it had a wooden lid before. This is quite plausible, since the traces show that it was the same worm.
This also explains the question of binding


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Rich SantaColoma's comments to Lisa Fagin Davis - by Aga Tentakulus - 30-03-2020, 07:27 PM
RE: Course in Cologne focusing on VMS - by ReneZ - 29-03-2020, 10:17 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Voynich Manuscript: Understanding the Untranslatable with Lisa Fagin Davis Torsten 43 5,185 15-09-2026, 06:03 PM
Last Post: Torsten
  [split] Voynich 2026 Conference QUESTIONS/COMMENTS BessAgritianin 37 6,307 04-07-2026, 09:17 PM
Last Post: Koen G
  Your suggestions for Voynich Ninja interview with Lisa Fagin Davis Koen G 16 16,826 02-04-2020, 10:43 PM
Last Post: Koen G
  Rich SantaColoma and his Forgery Theory stellar 25 28,277 27-07-2017, 04:32 PM
Last Post: voynichbombe

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: