19-02-2020, 11:44 AM
This is another red herring and a lot of people will waste time and resources on it.
What LFD and others don't see is that Beinecke 408 is a Sammelhandschrift, in this case works or notes by a single person on various topics that were bound together at some time. There is a time line. From this, the variations in the writing can be explained without difficulty.
Not that I think it plays a big role, this is just for the record what I think about this matter.
The only thing I want to comment on is the 'unknown glyph set', anyone who knows a little about Latin paleography should know what it is.
What LFD and others don't see is that Beinecke 408 is a Sammelhandschrift, in this case works or notes by a single person on various topics that were bound together at some time. There is a time line. From this, the variations in the writing can be explained without difficulty.
Not that I think it plays a big role, this is just for the record what I think about this matter.
The only thing I want to comment on is the 'unknown glyph set', anyone who knows a little about Latin paleography should know what it is.