In my view most image explanations and details in the vms,
although they may sound plausible for most people, are too much depending on:
* may be's, probabilities, could be's
* missing folio's, different order / configuration of the pages
* images that do not resemble at all are searched/modified until they do match
The author/painter already showed he knows how a ring looks and he showed he knows a ring sits on somebodies finger.
You refer to the "umbrella" thread where i exactly have the same issues and concerns, so that does not build your case very much.
I really can not understand, but perhaps it is wiser for me, not to interfere in postings like this. In that case: sorry and carry on.
although they may sound plausible for most people, are too much depending on:
* may be's, probabilities, could be's
* missing folio's, different order / configuration of the pages
* images that do not resemble at all are searched/modified until they do match
The author/painter already showed he knows how a ring looks and he showed he knows a ring sits on somebodies finger.
You refer to the "umbrella" thread where i exactly have the same issues and concerns, so that does not build your case very much.
I really can not understand, but perhaps it is wiser for me, not to interfere in postings like this. In that case: sorry and carry on.
Code:
I try not to hold tightly to my knowledge, concepts and intuitive perceptions.
I try to learn, to ask and gain progress by working together, comparing, filtering, changing opinions, logical thinking
and i try to change my perception & opinion often until i reach the point where all criteria match.
From that point on, it will be hard to change my view.