20-01-2020, 07:53 PM
That would depend on how narrow a transcription it was, wouldn't it? Seems like broad transcriptions make the text shorter, to me, at least in English, not that i have much experience with it. Given the time period we are talking about and the fact that this seems to be a unique glyph set (ie i don't think too many people did this at the time), my guess would be that it would be even more broad than what is considered broad today.
I am trying to figure out how broad it could be
aɪ æm You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. tu ˈfɪgjər aʊt haʊ brɔd ɪt kʊd bi
I am trying to figure out how broad it could be
aɪ æm You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. tu ˈfɪgjər aʊt haʊ brɔd ɪt kʊd bi

