Why the Voynich Zodiac - isn't

[ReneZ]

I am currently convinced that the Voynich Zodiac isn't a zodiac at all.
Instead, it's a late medieval Spanish-based myrogenesis - the attributing of specific characteristic to each degree of the zodiac.
The zodiac signs simply illustrate the month, the nymphs around the zodiac are paranatellonta, the aspects that astrology granted each degree around zodiacal sign.

I'm a bit confused.....

With

isn't a zodiac at all

what do you mean precisely with the word 'zodiac'. In the post you link, you write it isn't a horoscope.
Then above, you refer to the degrees of the zodiac, and the zodiac signs.

So, do you believe that there is a cycle of zodiac illustrations, however, its purpose is not clear?