Discussion of "A possible generating algorithm of the Voynich manuscript"

[Torsten]

"ReneZ"
So I try to imagine how this would have arisen.
This puts some constraints on how the system is initialised and how the changes are applied.

The changes during auto-copying are clearly not at all arbitrary

  I have the same opinion.
Therefore, I asked Timm a question earlier (I didn’t get an answer) why the word changes are kept in order to comply with the rule of impossibility of sequential writing of certain characters. Why complicate the procedure?

Please test it yourself. Fill an empty page with text by writing or by typing each word. Start always with the word 'repeat'.
In case A) just repeat the word 'repeat' until the page is full. Typos are not allowed.
In case B) repeat previously written words and replace always at least one letter with a different one. Typos and repeated words are allowed.
In case C) use arbitrary letter sequences with the length of 6 without copying a previously written word and without repeating the word generation method. Typos and repeated words are not allowed.