The problem is not the wording (it is only partly the wording). The problem is interpretation of structures and choice of examples. Taken as a whole, they are not cohesive. They look like a scattering of repeats of other people's guesses.
...
I could only find one article by Touwaide on the VMS (so far). Unfortunately, I was not able to find a link to the article which may have been published as a monograph by the Smithsonian Institute while he was working there as a historian, but is included as a 17-page chapter in a composite volume by publisher Palombi Editori:
Does anyone happen to have a link to:
"Il manoscritto più misterioso - L’Erbario Voynich"
I would like to read it if it's publicly available.
...
I could only find one article by Touwaide on the VMS (so far). Unfortunately, I was not able to find a link to the article which may have been published as a monograph by the Smithsonian Institute while he was working there as a historian, but is included as a 17-page chapter in a composite volume by publisher Palombi Editori:
Does anyone happen to have a link to:
"Il manoscritto più misterioso - L’Erbario Voynich"
I would like to read it if it's publicly available.