22-09-2019, 05:30 PM
The Voynich manuscript is unique and not unique. Looking at the illustrations of the individual sections, neither the majority of the supposed content nor the structure is anything special. Also for the balneological area there are conclusive comparisons. What makes VMS so special is the simple fact that you can not read it. At first glance, it is believed that it can not be hard to decode the text. The more stubborn you try, the further away you are from the solution. Anyway, that happened to me till now.
The comparison with the Codex Seraphinianus comes to mind. Luigi Serafini stated that his experience in writing it was similar to automatic writing; and that what he wanted his alphabet to convey was the sensation children feel with books they cannot yet understand, although they see that the writing makes sense for adults. If the author of the VMS wanted to create this kind of astonishment, then he somehow succeeded
The comparison with the Codex Seraphinianus comes to mind. Luigi Serafini stated that his experience in writing it was similar to automatic writing; and that what he wanted his alphabet to convey was the sensation children feel with books they cannot yet understand, although they see that the writing makes sense for adults. If the author of the VMS wanted to create this kind of astonishment, then he somehow succeeded